This article was originally published on InvestmentU.com.
A while ago, economists Sara Solnick and David Hemenway conducted a survey where they asked participants if they would rather earn $50,000 a year while other people made $25,000, or earn $100,000 a year while other people got $250,000.
Sit down for this one.
The majority of folks selected the first option. They would rather make twice as much as others – even if that meant earning half as much as they could have.
This is completely nuts, of course. Yet other findings in the study confirmed the envious nature of contemporary culture.
People said, for instance, they would rather be average-looking in a community where no one is considered attractive than merely good-looking in the company of stunners.
When it came to education, parents said they would rather have an average child in a crowd of dunces than a smart child in a class full of brilliant students.
What is going on here?
In his book The Mind of the Market: How Biology and Psychology Shape Our Economic Lives, Scientific American columnist Michael Shermer argues, “Our sense of happiness tends to be based on positional and relative rankings compared to what others have.”
The problem is this doesn’t make anyone happier.
Yet politicians and the media pour fuel on the fire by continually insisting that we live in an era of “grotesque economic inequality.”
If you are envious that the top 1% earn such a large percentage of total income, perhaps you should get angry… with the face in the mirror.
According to the Global Rich List, you need wages of just $32,400 a year to make it into the top 1% globally. (According to The World Bank, more than 3 billion people live on less than $2.50 a day.)
That means the average U.S. schoolteacher, accountant, registered nurse or police officer is a global one-percenter.
Congratulations. But now consider this: What would be the best way for the government to redistribute your income among the other 99% of us? (Good thing you’re a strong advocate of economic equality and social justice, right?)
Even the poor today are rich by historical standards. Most Americans living under the poverty line live in larger accommodations than the average European.
Historically, being poor meant having to struggle to get enough calories to survive. But today, we have the opposite problem. Obesity – indeed, morbid obesity – has created a healthcare crisis among the poor.
The average person living below the poverty line in the U.S. today has a phone, a car, a TV, indoor plumbing, and central heat and air. A century and a half ago, the richest robber barons could never have dreamed of such wealth.
Yet we still manage to make ourselves unhappy by comparing our lot with the richest 1%. Or, better still, the richest one-tenth of 1%.
Yes, Bill Gates has a 66,000-square-foot mansion that overlooks Lake Washington. Warren Buffett flies around the country in his Bombardier Challenger 6000. Oracle founder Larry Ellison recently traded his 453-foot, 82-room yacht for ownership of Hawaii’s sixth-largest island.
But so what?
Of all our weaknesses, surely none is more menial than envy. It denies us contentment. It wastes our time. And it is an insult to our own sense of dignity.
Worst of all, it is completely self-imposed.
“Envy is the most stupid of vices,” wrote the novelist Honoré de Balzac, “for there is no single advantage to be gained from it.”
We all know people who are smarter, fitter, richer, funnier, more talented or better-looking. But what of it?
Thinking this way only keeps you from appreciating your own uniqueness and self-worth: things that, not incidentally, do lead to greater happiness – especially when combined with a strong sense of purpose.
Shermer notes that there are four means by which we can bootstrap ourselves away from envy and toward happiness through purposeful action. These include…
1) Deep love and family commitment
2) Meaningful work and career
3) Social and political involvement
4) Transcendence and spirituality.
Note that psychologists have yet to discover the route to happiness by comparing ourselves with others. (Although it doesn’t hurt to occasionally measure yourself against your own ideals.)
Concentrating on your own fortunes – and improving those of others – is guaranteed to generate more satisfaction than sizing up the Joneses next door.
Besides, if you knew what the other guy is dealing with, you might prefer your own circumstances.
It’s easy to begrudge the other guy his blessings. But does it not make more sense to count your own instead?